The 340B program faces significant legal and policy challenges. A federal judge decertified 11 clinics from the program, siding with drugmakers. CMS’s proposed 340B payment changes drew critical comments from NASP and AHA. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital sued CVS Health over alleged 340B diversion. These developments highlight ongoing tensions between hospitals, drugmakers, and regulators.
A federal judge ruled against 11 clinics’ 340B certifications, supporting drugmakers’ claims of statutory non-compliance.
NASP submitted comments on CMS’s CY 2027 HOPPS rule, focusing on 340B reimbursement and specialty pharmacy impacts.
Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital alleges CVS diverted $18 million in 340B savings, filing suit in E.D. Wisconsin.
AHA opposes CMS’s proposed increase in 340B repayment rates, warning of significant financial impacts on hospitals.
AAMC and AHA filed comments urging changes to CMS’s Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and Sen. Cassidy’s 340B draft.
AHA recommends CMS require upfront negotiated prices instead of retrospective rebates in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.
Recent court rulings involve contract pharmacy access, patient eligibility, and reimbursement practices in the 340B program.
AHA, AAMC, and AMGA submitted comments opposing 340B payment cuts and other provisions in CMS’s proposed outpatient rule.
HRSA will launch a revised 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program on January 1, 2027, with limited scope to MFP drugs.
Hospital leaders prepare for financial pressures from HR 1’s Medicaid work requirements and other provisions.
- Hospitals face increased financial pressure from CMS’s proposed 340B repayment rate hike.
- Decertification of clinics may lead to reduced access to discounted drugs for patients.
- Ongoing legal battles could result in further restrictions on 340B program participation.
- Potential changes to Medicare reimbursement could impact specialty pharmacy services.
- Healthcare systems may need to adjust strategies due to Medicaid and ACA cuts.
- Hospitals can engage with CMS during comment periods to influence 340B policy changes.
- Specialty pharmacies may explore partnerships to mitigate reimbursement impacts.
- Healthcare systems can use data analytics to ensure 340B compliance and optimize savings.
- Organizations can collaborate with industry groups to advocate for favorable 340B policies.
- Hospitals may seek alternative funding or partnerships to offset financial pressures.
- Review and ensure compliance with 340B statutory requirements to avoid decertification.
- Participate in CMS comment periods to express concerns and suggestions on proposed rules.
- Monitor ongoing litigation for potential impacts on 340B program participation.
- Evaluate financial strategies to address potential revenue losses from 340B changes.
- Engage with industry associations to stay informed on 340B policy developments.
- A federal judge ruled against 11 clinics, supporting drugmakers’ claims of statutory non-compliance.
- The U.S. District Court for D.C. granted partial summary judgment to Amgen and Genentech.
- The court found clinics received funding through Sagebrush Health Services, not directly from government sources.
- Froedtert alleges CVS diverted $18 million in 340B savings from 2020 to 2025.
- The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
- Defendants include CVS Health, CaremarkPCS Health, and WellPartner.
- NASP submitted comments on CMS’s CY 2027 HOPPS rule.
- Focus on Medicare reimbursement for 340B-acquired drugs and specialty pharmacy impacts.
- Comments address operational, dispensing, and compliance considerations.
- AHA opposes CMS’s proposed increase in 340B repayment rates.
- The proposed rule would raise repayment from 0.5% to 3%.
- AHA warns of significant financial impacts on hospitals.
- AAMC and AHA filed comments on CMS’s Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.
- AAMC wants prospective application of Maximum Fair Price.
- AHA comments on Sen. Cassidy’s 340B Drug Pricing Integrity and Affordability for Patients Act.
- AHA recommends upfront negotiated prices instead of rebates.
- Comments filed on CMS’s proposed rule for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program.
- AHA argues for point-of-sale pricing for eligible drugs.
- HRSA will launch a revised 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program on January 1, 2027.
- The pilot program is limited to MFP drugs from 2026-2027.
- MFP drugs represent less than 5.5% of 2025 340B sales.
| Court | Matter | Date |
|---|---|---|
| D.D.C. | Court sides with drugmakers in 340B dispute, decertifies 11 clinics (U.S. District Court for D.C.; partial summary judgment) [source] | August 20, 2026 |
| E.D. Wis. | Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital Inc v. CVS Health Corporation [source] | August 20, 2026 |
| M.D. Fla. | The Elevance Health Companies, Inc. v. Senderra Rx Partners, LLC [source] | September 4, 2026 |
| D.D.C. | COREWELL HEALTH WILLIAM BEAUMONT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL v. KENNEDY [source] | September 3, 2026 |
- HRSA’s 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program launches January 1, 2027. [source]
- CMS’s final decision on CY 2027 HOPPS rule expected soon. [source]
- Outcome of Froedtert Hospital’s lawsuit against CVS could impact 340B diversion practices. [source]
- Potential CMS revisions to Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program rules. [source]
This briefing is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, financial, or compliance advice. Automated summarization may contain errors or omissions, and source materials may change after publication. Recipients should independently verify all information against the cited primary sources before relying on it.
© 2026 MedMatrix Rx. All rights reserved.