Johnson & Johnson’s new claims data requirement for 340B pricing takes effect tomorrow, impacting all covered entities. Meanwhile, Scripps Health anticipates a $100 million annual revenue impact from HR 1 due to Medi-Cal changes. NASP and hospital groups have submitted comments on CMS’s proposed 340B payment changes, urging adjustments to preserve patient access and financial stability. Ongoing litigation continues to shape the 340B landscape, with notable cases involving major health systems and pharmaceutical companies.
Starting September 15, J&J requires 340B entities to submit claims data or face pricing suspension. Compliance restores pricing within 10 days.
Scripps Health estimates HR 1 will reduce its net revenue by up to $100 million annually, driven by Medi-Cal enrollment cuts and provider fee limits.
NASP submitted comments to CMS on proposed changes to Medicare reimbursement for 340B drugs. The comments included implications for specialty pharmacy services.
Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital alleges CVS diverted $18 million in 340B savings, filing suit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
AHA, AAMC, and AMGA submitted comments urging CMS to withdraw or modify key provisions of the 2027 outpatient payment rule affecting 340B drug payments.
HRSA’s revised 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program will start January 1, 2027, focusing on MFP drugs, representing a small fraction of 340B sales.
AHA urges CMS not to finalize proposals accelerating Medicare payment clawbacks and cutting 340B reimbursement, citing significant hospital cost impacts.
A federal judge allowed hospital and health center groups to intervene in AbbVie’s lawsuit challenging 340B contract pharmacy restrictions.
AAMC and AHA filed comments targeting CMS’s Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program rule and Sen. Cassidy’s 340B discussion draft, seeking key changes.
Elevance Health filed a lawsuit against Senderra Rx Partners in the Middle District of Florida over 340B program issues.
- J&J’s claims data requirement could disrupt 340B pricing access for non-compliant entities.
- HR 1’s impact on Medi-Cal could significantly reduce Scripps Health’s revenue.
- CMS’s proposed 340B payment cuts may strain hospital finances further.
- Litigation outcomes could alter 340B program rules and reimbursement practices.
- Non-compliance with new manufacturer requirements may lead to pricing suspensions.
- Entities can use claims data submission to ensure continued 340B pricing access.
- Engagement in CMS comment periods allows stakeholders to influence policy outcomes.
- Hospitals can prepare for HR 1 impacts by adjusting financial strategies.
- Participation in HRSA’s 340B Rebate Model Pilot offers insights into new pricing models.
- Intervening in ongoing litigation provides a platform to advocate for favorable 340B policies.
- Submit required claims data to J&J to avoid 340B pricing suspension.
- Review and adjust financial forecasts in light of HR 1’s potential impacts.
- Engage with CMS on proposed 340B payment changes during comment periods.
- Monitor ongoing litigation for developments that may affect 340B program participation.
- Prepare for HRSA’s 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program launch in 2027.
- J&J requires 340B entities to submit claims data starting September 15.
- Non-compliance results in pricing suspension, restored within 10 days post-compliance.
- Applies to all covered entities regardless of drug dispensing location.
- HR 1 could cut Scripps Health’s revenue by $100 million annually.
- Medi-Cal enrollment reductions and provider fee limits drive the estimate.
- Statewide impact on California estimated at $9.5 billion annually.
- NASP submitted comments on CMS’s proposed 340B payment changes.
- Comments address reimbursement methodology and specialty pharmacy implications.
- Focus on preserving patient access and operational considerations.
- Froedtert Hospital alleges CVS diverted $18 million in 340B savings.
- Lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
- Claims involve CaremarkPCS, CVS Specialty, and WellPartner.
- AHA, AAMC, and AMGA submitted comments against CMS’s 2027 rule.
- Groups oppose 340B payment cuts and site-neutral payment expansion.
- Comments highlight financial pressures and prior authorization concerns.
- HRSA’s 340B Rebate Model Pilot starts January 1, 2027.
- Focuses on MFP drugs, representing less than 5.5% of 2025 340B sales.
- Pilot aims to test new pricing models amid MFP and 340B conflicts.
- J&J requires claims data submission for 340B pricing from September 15.
- Non-compliant entities face pricing suspension after two notices.
- Policy affects all covered entities, regardless of drug administration location.
- Washington State Health Care Authority prohibits contract pharmacies from billing Medicaid for drugs purchased at 340B prices.
- This applies to both fee-for-service and managed care claims.
- Covered entities must bill the state at Actual Acquisition Cost for fee-for-service claims.
- Source: Washington State Health Care Authority
- Date: September 2026
| Court | Matter | Date |
|---|---|---|
| M.D. Fla. | The Elevance Health Companies, Inc. v. Senderra Rx Partners, LLC [source] | September 4, 2026 |
| D.D.C. | COREWELL HEALTH WILLIAM BEAUMONT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL v. KENNEDY [source] | September 3, 2026 |
| D. Maryland | State of New York v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [source] | August 27, 2026 |
| E.D. Wis. | Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital Inc v. CVS Health Corporation [source] | August 20, 2026 |
| Manufacturer | Action | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson | Requires 340B entities to submit claims data for pricing access. [source] | September 14, 2026 |
- J&J’s claims data requirement for 340B pricing takes effect September 15. [source]
- HRSA’s 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program launches January 1, 2027. [source]
- CMS to review comments on 2027 outpatient payment rule proposals. [source]
- Monitor ongoing litigation involving 340B program disputes. [source]
This briefing is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, financial, or compliance advice. Automated summarization may contain errors or omissions, and source materials may change after publication. Recipients should independently verify all information against the cited primary sources before relying on it.
© 2026 MedMatrix Rx. All rights reserved.